Market-Oriented Farmer Collective Membership and Farm Income in Jammu & Kashmir: Evidence from Apple- and Vegetable-Growing Regions

Main Article Content

Arshad Bhat

Abstract

The land use features of Jammu and Kashmir are small and fragmented land holdings, high reliance on horticulture, challenging topography and limited market access. These may entail high transaction costs and restriction on bargaining power for farmers, especially within the apple and vegetable value chain. Farmer collectives such as Farmer Producer Organizations and others based on farmers’ organizations have been found to facilitate the aggregation of produce, provide better market access, reduce transaction costs and enhance farmers’ involvement in farmers’ value chains. The study aimed at finding out if there was any relationship between farmer collectives and increased farm income among visitors to apple and vegetable farmers in Jammu and Kashmir who belong to market-oriented farmer collectives. The analysis is based upon primary data from a cross-sectional survey of farmers, including 180 farmers and 180 non-farmers in market-oriented farmer collectives. Two kinds of treatment effects are estimated: the actual treatment effect and the counterfactual treatment effect, with the former considered in this paper as the exogenous treatment effect on average income of members, and the latter as the conditional treatment effect for those eligible for the collective but who wish to receive a payoff directly from the firm. The baseline approach used is Ordinary Least Squares estimation, while an Endogenous Switching Regression framework is used to account for potential self-selection effects both into collective membership and to estimate the actual treatment and potential counterfactual treatment effects on average income for members. The findings showed that collective members’ income from their farming activity is better than the non-members who are similar. At the time of testing, membership was estimated to lead to a substantial per capita income difference on the ATET, due to observable selection as well as unobservable selection at the time of the test, of INR 71,500 a year. The estimated effects also vary across the production systems with an estimate of INR 89,200 for apple growers and INR 46,800 for vegetable growers. Collective membership under market-oriented approach may be a factor to better farm income in geographically limited agricultural areas as it enables farmers’ participation in markets and boosts the farmers’ access to the collective economic services. The study emphasized improving market linkages, aggregation, institutional services, and value-chain integration in the farmer groups in J&K.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Bhat, A. (2026). Market-Oriented Farmer Collective Membership and Farm Income in Jammu & Kashmir: Evidence from Apple- and Vegetable-Growing Regions. Repositories of Agriculture, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17352/ra.000007
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Bhat A.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Government of Jammu & Kashmir. Economic survey of Jammu and Kashmir 2021-22. Srinagar: Directorate of Economics and Statistics; 2022.

Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Agricultural census 2015-16: all India report on number and area of operational holdings. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare; 2018.

NITI Aayog. Raising agricultural productivity and incomes in hill and mountain regions of India. New Delhi: Government of India; 2018.

Singh S, Sharma R. Agricultural marketing reforms and farmer incomes in Jammu and Kashmir. Indian J Agric Mark. 2020;34(1):23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i10-11/155840

Trebbin A, Hassler M. Farmers’ producer companies in India: a new concept for collective action? Environ Plan A. 2012;44(2):411-427. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227472660_Farmers%27_Producer_Companies_in_India_A_New_Concept_for_Collective_Action DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a44143

Singh S, Vatta K. Farmer producer organizations and inclusive agricultural growth in India. J Rural Dev. 2019;38(2):159-180.

Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Formation and promotion of 10,000 farmer producer organizations: operational guidelines. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare; 2020.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. Farmer producer organizations in India: status, issues and policy way forward. Mumbai: NABARD; 2022.

Trebbin A. Linking small farmers to modern retail through producer organizations. Food Policy. 2014;45:35-44. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.007

Sriram V, Singh S, Arora S. Institutional innovations for smallholder aggregation in Indian agriculture. Rev Agrar Stud. 2020;10(1):1-24.

Tripathi RS, Singh S. Farmer producer organizations in India: status, challenges and policy implications. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2021;34(1):35-46.

Thorat A, Joshi PK, Birthal PS. Producer organizations, market access, and agricultural transformation in India. Food Policy. 2021;100:102017. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102017

Nath P, Behera B. Performance and sustainability of farmer producer organizations in India. J Rural Stud. 2021;82:299-309.

Birner R, Bosselmann AS, Daum T, Nkonya E. The effectiveness of producer organizations for smallholder farmers. World Dev. 2021;144:105485. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X21000978

Rawal V, Verma A, Sharma M. Agricultural markets in hill regions: constraints and policy options. Indian J Agric Econ. 2019;74(4):473-489.

Sharma A, Singh R, Kaur P. Post-harvest losses and market inefficiencies in mountain agriculture. Food Policy. 2022;107:102214.

Kumar A, Sharma R. Role of farmer collectives in enhancing market access in hill agriculture. Indian J Agric Mark. 2020;34(2):1-15.

Singh V, Kumar A, Joshi PK. Collective action and market participation in hill agriculture. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2022;35(2):211-224.

Bhat MA, Rather NA. Agricultural marketing constraints and price realization in horticulture sector of Jammu and Kashmir. Indian J Agric Econ. 2020;75(3):345-359.

Dar AA, Bhat MA, Ahmad N. Structure and efficiency of apple marketing in Kashmir Valley. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ. 2021;11(4):463-479.

Qayoom A, Bhat MA. Price formation and market power in apple value chains of Jammu and Kashmir. J Agrar Change. 2023;23(2):412-428. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.12489

Bhat R, Saleem S. Digital platforms, market integration, and price realization among apple growers in Kashmir. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2024;37(1):89-102.

Rashid S, Wani MH. Market-oriented farmer producer organizations and income diversification in Jammu and Kashmir. Econ Polit Wkly. 2023;58(17):52-60.

Ahmed S, Khan MA, Wani NA. Value addition and income enhancement through farmer producer organizations in horticulture-dominated regions. J Rural Dev. 2025;44(1):67-85.

Fischer E, Qaim M. Linking smallholders to markets: determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Dev. 2012;40(6):1255-1268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018

Bernard T, Spielman DJ. Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. World Dev. 2009;37(10):1853-1867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.08.001

Ma W, Abdulai A. Linking apple farmers to markets: determinants and impacts of marketing contracts in China. Agric Econ. 2016;47(1):93-105. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-04-2015-0035

Verhofstadt E, Maertens M. Can agricultural cooperatives reduce poverty? Heterogeneous impact of cooperative membership on farmers’ welfare in Rwanda. World Dev. 2014;64:767-777. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.006

Prathiban KT, Singh S, Vatta K. Farmer producer companies in India: performance and sustainability. Indian J Agric Econ. 2015;70(3):373-386.

Barrett CB, Christiaensen L, Sheahan M, Shimeles A. On the structural transformation of rural Africa. J Econ Perspect. 2020;34(3):141-168.